Bike and Cycling Forum > Industry & Events > Professional Cycling > Wanna be a Pro sprinter?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2011, 02:56 PM   #1
Moderator
 
Xela's Avatar
Bikes
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,238
Wanna be a Pro sprinter?

I quite liked this article detailing all the tweaks Cav has made to his bike in his quest to win at the line. I'd like to see some data out of that powermeter during a sprint.

Pro Bike: Mark Cavendish?s HTC Specialized McLaren Venge | Cyclingnews.com


Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Xela is offline  

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 03:41 PM   #2
Total noob
 
Industry_Hack's Avatar
Bikes
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,082
That's pretty hardcore. He's more than a pound over the lower limit just for stiffness.
__________________
Please to go IndustryOutsider.com and "Like" us. More giveaways coming soon!
Interbike 2008 photos | Interbike 2009 photos

Likes Given: 1

Industry_Hack is offline  

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 05:35 PM   #3
Who put that curb there?
 
Tedzo's Avatar
Bikes
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 168
The Tarmac SL3 is supposedly stiffer though and less weight.
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies--they are totally useless, but they sure bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
Tedzo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 06:41 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Xela's Avatar
Bikes
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedzo View Post
The Tarmac SL3 is supposedly stiffer though and less weight.
Hmmm....my Specialized dealer told me the Venge is stiffer than the Tarmac; especially at the BB.

*edit: Just did a little more reading, Tedzo, and you're right; Specialized press release with the Venge still claims the Tarmac is "lighter and stiffer." I would think that frame stiffness would be most important to Cav. Need to do some more research.

*further edit*: It appears the key is "lighter AND stiffer". Specialized says that the Venge is as stiff as the SL3, but apparently not as light. Here's their statement on stiffness:

THE TARGET NUMBERS FOR TORSIONAL STIFFNESS — EQUIVALENT TO THE SL3 — WERE EXTRAORDINARY CONSIDERING THE BIKE’S AERO PROFILE. THE EXTREMELY PRECISE PLIES CREATED BY McLAREN’S ENGINEERS ALLOWED US TO REALIZE THESE GOALS VIA AN EXHAUSTIVE LAYUP SCHEDULE. AS THEY PUT IT, “THE MORE ACCURATELY CUT PLIES COULD BE PLACED MORE PRECISELY.” A POSITIONING OR DIRECTIONAL TWEAK OF A FEW MILLIMETERS ON ANY GIVEN PLY DIRECTLY RELATES TO IMPROVED STIFFNESS, ALLOWING EACH PLY TO BE METICULOUSLY PINPOINTED ACCORDING TO THEORETICAL WEIGHT AND STIFFNESS COMPUTER MODELS.

Last edited by Xela; 05-16-2011 at 06:50 PM.
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Xela is offline  

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 07:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,223
When you reach that level of skill and fitness, unless the guy is on total junk (which none of them are) my personal opinion is that its far less about who saved a gram somewhere, or whether one frame is stiffer than the other and far more about the heart and desire of the rider. Cav is successful because of his desire, heart and talent. He wants to win bad enough he might beat the majority of the field on a 70s Huffy.


photosbymark is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I wanna see pictures! HighRoller General Bike Discussion 14 10-11-2011 01:49 AM

FOLLOW US ON
PHOTO OF THE DAY
Unforgettable Windy 2nd Century

Newest Classifieds