Bike and Cycling Forum > Bike Rack > Recumbent > Recumbent Speeds
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2009, 10:38 AM   #171
Junior Member
 
Niels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
records

Sorry, but you are to uptimistic.
Recumbents did only beat the long distance UCi records, and as long as Boardman helds his 56 k/h only fully faired recumbents hold the hour record and above.

Wish i could make it to:
200m 9.572 Sireau
1K 58.875 Tournant

But i never will.

Niels


Niels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 03:51 PM   #172
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 454
Duncan I'm glad to see you have brought up another issue we (DF riders) can tinkle on: Trikes are faster off the line? Not even the staunchest proponent of recumbents has said that before in print. None that I've read.

And an unfaired trike is a little more than a fast shopping cart. Faster off the line? I can almost accept the 2-wheel bent rider's speed claims. At least they make good times on the track. But an unfaired trike? No, no, no, no.......

I've never ridden a 2-wheel bent. But I have ridden an upright trike as used here in England for endurance races. The least of their qualities is speed off the line. You've got 2 wheels to get moving in the rear, not one. Plus they weigh a ton and a half.

This promises to be a long thread. Duncan, you should start a new thread so we can battle over recumbent trikes. This one's getting too long to navigate.

And thanks again for a new vein to mine. Last hole was dug out.
IanHighfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 04:25 PM   #173
Junior Member
Bikes
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels View Post
Sorry, but you are to uptimistic.
Recumbents did only beat the long distance UCi records, and as long as Boardman helds his 56 k/h only fully faired recumbents hold the hour record and above.

Wish i could make it to:
200m 9.572 Sireau
1K 58.875 Tournant

But i never will.

Niels
Boardman's records have been moved to Best Human Effort by UCI. They too are not UCI records anymore. And they are closer and closer to being broken anyhow. The effect of the UCI on the athletes that are riding recumbents cannot be dismissed.
DuncanWatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 04:28 PM   #174
Junior Member
Bikes
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanHighfield View Post
Duncan I'm glad to see you have brought up another issue we (DF riders) can tinkle on: Trikes are faster off the line? Not even the staunchest proponent of recumbents has said that before in print. None that I've read.

And an unfaired trike is a little more than a fast shopping cart. Faster off the line? I can almost accept the 2-wheel bent rider's speed claims. At least they make good times on the track. But an unfaired trike? No, no, no, no.......

I've never ridden a 2-wheel bent. But I have ridden an upright trike as used here in England for endurance races. The least of their qualities is speed off the line. You've got 2 wheels to get moving in the rear, not one. Plus they weigh a ton and a half.

This promises to be a long thread. Duncan, you should start a new thread so we can battle over recumbent trikes. This one's getting too long to navigate.

And thanks again for a new vein to mine. Last hole was dug out.
Ride a trike in a big organized ride, you will beat nearly everyone off the line at a light. A recumbent trike doesn't have to unclip, 2 wheels off the back, pfft, not all trikes are like that.

A bog-standard tadpole trike from ICE is quite fast off the line.
DuncanWatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 06:45 PM   #175
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
an upright trike is nothing like a recumbent trike. My catrike speed weighs 25 lbs and I'm sorry but no upright can beat a tadpole trike off the line. there is one drivewheel in back and two upfront that steer. First off, you are already clipped in and if you are drag racing, you are in a low gear and can have immediate speed at the drop of a hat. A trike however does NOT have the top speed that an upright bike has.
lowracer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 07:33 PM   #176
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowracer1 View Post
an upright trike is nothing like a recumbent trike. My catrike speed weighs 25 lbs and I'm sorry but no upright can beat a tadpole trike off the line. there is one drivewheel in back and two upfront that steer. First off, you are already clipped in and if you are drag racing, you are in a low gear and can have immediate speed at the drop of a hat. A trike however does NOT have the top speed that an upright bike has.
Fair enough, lowracer. But I still would put my money on a RedBull-juiced fourteen-year-old on a BMX bike. My little brother dusts me off the mark with his and I could destroy any trike ever even thought of. I'd use platform BMX pedals and my hill climb bike of 9 pounds with a softish 28mm rear to keep tyre slip to a minimum. With 20s or 23s inflated to max we spin out from a dead stop.

Any BMX riders out there? I think they are the fastest bikes from the go. Not even close.
IanHighfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 12:23 AM   #177
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
Every bmx race I've ever seen here in the states has a drop gate. All the racers have both feet on the pedals and are pushing against the gate so yes they get a pretty quick launch. In an unaided launch on a street, they don't do quite as well......slower to the 20 ft mark, but then quickly accelerate. It would be a close race but really would depend on the length of the race course.
lowracer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 01:37 AM   #178
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowracer1 View Post
Every bmx race I've ever seen here in the states has a drop gate. All the racers have both feet on the pedals and are pushing against the gate so yes they get a pretty quick launch. In an unaided launch on a street, they don't do quite as well......slower to the 20 ft mark, but then quickly accelerate. It would be a close race but really would depend on the length of the race course.
lowracer, I've actually done this with my younger brother. Me on a road bike and him on his BMX. All the brat does is mash on his right pedal and push off with his left foot on the ground. He's a bike length in front of me before I even know what's happening. I was using Speedplay pedals but still, my first attached foot was not enough to stay with his initial thrust and then it was all over. Even if I could clip in immediately I don't think it would have mattered.

I suspect it's something to do with the 20 inch wheel size and weight? I really can't explain why this is so. But I'd bet a million of your dollars a good kid on a BMX beats any bike (other than another BMX) ridden by any rider at 10 meters.
IanHighfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2009, 01:41 AM   #179
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
A smaller drive wheel spins up faster than a larger wheel. Lower moment of inertia if I remember right. Thats why trikes with 20" drive wheels are very quick off the line.
lowracer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2009, 03:21 AM   #180
Total noob
 
Industry_Hack's Avatar
Bikes
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,471
Below something like 20MPH, twenty inch wheels are more efficient. Sheldon said so.


__________________
Please to go IndustryOutsider.com and "Like" us. More giveaways coming soon!
Interbike 2008 photos | Interbike 2009 photos

Industry_Hack is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone ride a Recumbent? trekTrey Recumbent 63 10-12-2011 09:28 PM
Single speeds and bike messengers SteveM Fixed & Singlespeed 19 10-02-2010 03:40 PM
Recumbent Trikes? Casualcyclist Recumbent 41 08-31-2010 05:32 PM
Recumbent ruminations IanHighfield Recumbent 5 12-11-2009 05:02 PM

FOLLOW US ON
  • rss
  • facebook
  • twitter
PHOTO OF THE DAY
Unforgettable Windy 2nd Century