Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
Thanks for the idea on construction technique, though. Under 8 pounds seems pretty light, even for an upright. I'm curious how much carbon you use. I presume you're making what amounts to carbon lugs so that you have something to glue? One advantage of carbon is that you're not stuck using tubes, and so far my construction technique has been carbon-over-foam, with the foam likewise left in for structural reinforcement.
|
Good we can work a friendly thread.
My man got the idea for carbon over steel while watching archers shoot alloy arrow wrapped in carbon fiber. Easton Alumimum in the USA makes such arrows.
He tried thin alloy with carbon but had stiffer results going to very thin quality steel with linear and fabric CF V-bagged to the outside. He would shoot me for giving exact numbers. You understand, I'm sure. We make our own CF joints to glue into. The tubing is all round because this is easier to work and the bikes made this way are for hill climbing only. In a hill climb aero is not important. You rarely, if ever, go over 15 mph.
In truth, I don't think the result is all that different from all CF or some of the light steel models. Yes, some all steel bikes can be made well under 10 pounds. The wall thicknesses are around .007-.010.
These bikes will break if bounced hard on rail crossings or if abused by heavy riders. They are hill climb bikes for finished and smooth spinners who know how to ride a steady line.