[Rhythm]

I honestly can't remember as it happened about a month back (and I have multiple sigs depending on the forum, I try my best to base the sig off the forum style ie a forum where youth might visit wouldn't have a gnarley image or text).

This was all the info I was given.

"Your Signature
Rhythm,

We have received several complaints about your signature. Sorry, but is does violate the board's TOS.
I deleted it.


--AllenG
BikeForums Moderator"

Weird part was that I had it for 4 months prior without issue. Put it up in July it was taken off in December.

________________

Still I don't think its necessary to drag the drama too much over, seems like all the people on here are quite nice people and the atmosphere is pretty positive I'd like to keep it that way.

We don't want another Tarck.

 

[Industry_Hack]

We don't want another Tarck.

I'm famous.

 

[djcyberlegend]

I was stripped of my sig over there too... I don't post much so I can't cause too much trouble. I was never was banned for it but it has led me to look for other forums, such as this one.

I wasn't given the ultimate boot there either, I took the high road and left on my own. The way I see it, I'm not comfortable being in a forum that chooses not to let me express myself truthfully.

I'm curious to know what these sigs were.

+1 for Rhythm's sig, mine was similar to what I have here, with the addition of the Danasoft sign that shows anyone who views it their IP address, OS, and a random quote. IMG code is not enabled for sigs on this forum so I can't use the Danasoft sign here in my sig.

The so-called site admin on that forum who stripped it from me accused it of sending malware into the system, however, the sig wasn't the source of the malware. The malware most likely came in through something I posted earlier that day, I discovered later that day that the lappy I used to make the post had picked up a malware infection that took me 3 hours to remove.

 

[Industry_Hack]

OK, I remember that! So they caved to the stupid people who were concerned that they could see their own info. Brilliant.

 

[djcyberlegend]

OK, I remember that! So they caved to the stupid people who were concerned that they could see their own info. Brilliant.

Yes, in a nutshell.

Here's what the sign looked like:

 

[Industry_Hack]

The people that complained are the same kind of people that wrote big checks to Y2K consultants.

 

[djcyberlegend]

The people that complained are the same kind of people that wrote big checks to Y2K consultants.

I can picture that happening...